MAMTA DAS vs PUNEET DAS

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:18.12.2025 Judgment pronounced on:24.12.2025 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 160/2022 MAMTA DAS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Zishan A. Siddiqui and Ms. Amisha Upadhyay, Advocates. versus PUNEET DAS .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. REVIEW PET. 624/2025 (Seeking review in judgment dt. 22.09.2025 filed by Petitioner) CM APPL. 78637/2025 (Stay) & CM APPL. 78638/2025 (Delay of 2 days in Re-filing the review petition) 1. The present Review Petition instituted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, read with Section 114 and Order XLVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeks review of the final Judgment dated 22.09.20251 passed by this Court in MAT.APP. (F.C.) No. 160/2022, whereby this Court affirmed the Judgement and Decree dated 31.05.2022 passed by the learned Principal Judge, 1 Impugned Judgement Signature Not Verified MAT.APP.(F.C.) 160/2022 Page 1 of 6 Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:24.12.2025 11:59:09 Family Court, Tis Hazari Courts (Central), Delhi, in IDA No. 13/2017, granting a decree of divorce in favour of the Respondent- husband on the ground of desertion under Section 10(1)(ix) of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. 2. During the course of arguments in the Review Petition, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant-wife contended that Paragraph 50(c) of the Impugned Judgment suffers from a material error apparent on the face of the record. In order to examine the said submission, we consider it appropriate to reproduce Paragraph 50(c) of the Impugned Judgment, which reads as follows: “50. Upon a scrutiny of the pleadings, depositions, and documen