Delhi High Court · 2025-12-09
M/S ANANYAA SPACE DESIGN AND CONSULTANTS & ANR. vs M/S RANJIT INTERIOR
- Citation / case number
- CM(M)-1043/2025 2025:DHC:11084
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- M/S ANANYAA SPACE DESIGN AND CONSULTANTS & ANR.
- Respondent
- M/S RANJIT INTERIOR
Judgment text excerpt
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 09.12.2025 + CM(M) 1043/2025, CM APPL. 34057/2025, 47008/2025 & 34058/2025 M/S ANANYAA SPACE DESIGN AND CONSULTANTS & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vatsal Kumar, Ms. Anumeha and Ms. Kavya, Advocates. versus M/S RANJIT INTERIOR .....Respondent Through: Mr. R.K. Chaudhary, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) 1. Petitioners/defendants have brought this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to assail order dated 04.01.2025 passed by the learned Commercial Court, whereby application of the petitioners/defendants to place on record additional documents was dismissed. I have heard learned senior counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for respondent. 2. Broadly speaking, after framing of issues in the suit for recovery of money towards consideration of work done, the petitioners/defendants filed CM(M) 1043/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages Signature Not Verified GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155 Digitally Signed 70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26 fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.12.09 17:11:09 -08'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:09.12.2025 18:10:36 an application under Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC seeking permission to place on record certain additional documents, which are number of emails exchanged between the parties, photographs of the work site and certain audio-video recordings between representatives of the parties. The said application was dismissed by the learned trial court by way of the ord