KAVAL BAJAJ vs SUMAN GHANDIOK & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 11.12.2025 + CM(M) 1119/2022 KAVAL BAJAJ .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Sarbjit Sharma and Dr. Sumit Sharma, Advocates versus SUMAN GHANDIOK & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate for R2 with R2 in person CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R (ORAL) CM APPL. 78444/2025 (for disposal of petition) 1. This application, drafted by petitioner/landlord and countersigned by the present respondent no. 2 and counsel for all respondents, seeks disposal of the present petition on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties. I have heard learned counsel for both sides. 2. It appears that initially, an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(d) Delhi Rent Control Act was filed by the present petitioner and her sister, the present respondent no. 1 against the present respondents no. 2-4, which CM(M) 1119/2022 Page 1 of 3 pages Signature Not Verified GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570 Digitally Signed 996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.12.11 17:07:36 -08'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:11.12.2025 17:08:43 petition was allowed ex-parte. The present respondent no. 2 filed an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, which was dismissed by the learned Rent Controller, so he filed an appeal, culminating into the impugned order, whereby the eviction order was set aside by the learned Rent Control Tribunal. Since the learned Rent Controller gave categorical findings that it is the present petitioner only who is owner of th