Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-12-11

JOY DEB CHATTERJEE vs MEENU GHOSH & ORS.

Citation / case number
CS(OS)-452/2023 2025:DHC:11182
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
JOY DEB CHATTERJEE
Respondent
MEENU GHOSH & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 8th October, 2025 Judgment pronounced on: 11th December, 2025 I.A. 40688/2024 IN + CS(OS) 452/2023 with CRL.M.A. 10147/2024, I.A. 14173/2023, I.A. 14174/2023, I.A. 14176/2023, I.A. 23253/2023 and I.A. 23466/2023 JOY DEB CHATTERJEE .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Bharat Arora, Mr. Hardik Nagpal, Advocates along with plaintiff in person. versus MEENU GHOSH & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Saurav Agrawal, Mr. Sahil A. Garg Narwana, Mr. Dipesh Singhal, Mr. Kapil Baba, Mr. Munesh Kaushik, Mr. Shivam Choudhary, Ms. Prachi Dubey, Mr. Aarya Bhat and Ms. Kiran Devrani, Advocates for D-1 to D-3. Mr. Ayush Mittal, Advocate for proposed D-4. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL JUDGMENT AMIT BANSAL, J. I.A. 40688/2024 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908) 1. By way of this judgment, I shall dispose of the present application filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VIVEK MISHRA CS(OS) 452/2023 Page 1 of 13 Signing Date:11.12.2025 13:13:14 Civil Procedure, 1908. The plaintiff seeks interim relief in respect of the following three Memorandum of Agreements (hereinafter collectively referred to as the ‘impugned MOAs’): (a) Memorandum of Agreement dated 20th March 2019 between the plaintiff and the defendant no.1 for a sum of Rs. 15,00,000/-; (b) Memorandum of Agreement dated 17th August 2019 between the plaintiff and the defendant no.1 for a sum of Rs. 1,15,00,000/-; (c) Memorandum of Agreement dated 17th August 2019 between the plaintiff and the defendant no.3 for a sum of Rs. 40,00,000/-. 2. In the suit, the plaintiff inter alia seeks a declaration that the aforesaid three impugned MOAs are false and fabr

JOY DEB CHATTERJEE vs MEENU GHOSH & ORS. · Niyam