Delhi High Court · 2025-12-23
HARJIT SINGH vs SARDAR RAWEL SINGH DECD THR LRS & ORS
- Citation / case number
- RFA(OS)-20/2010 2025:DHC:11744-DB
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- HARJIT SINGH
- Respondent
- SARDAR RAWEL SINGH DECD THR LRS & ORS
Judgment text excerpt
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 16.12.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 23.12.2025 Judgment uploaded on: 23.12.2025 + RFA(OS) 20/2010, CM APPL. 10645/2024, CM APPL. 47279/2024, CM APPL. 52908/2025, CM APPL. 53109/2025, CM APPL. 10645/2024, CM APPL. 70682/2025, CM APPL. 70684/2025 HARJIT SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Ms. Nazia Khanam and Mr. A.K. Dubey, Advs. with Appellant in-person. versus SARDAR RAWEL SINGH DEAD THR LRS & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Aditya Sharma and Mr. Vedic Thukral, Advs. for R- 3 with R-3 in-person. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. for R- 6. + RFA(OS) 26/2010, CM APPL. 27503/2018, CM APPL. 43474/2022, CM APPL. 29651/2023, CM APPL. 70681/2025, CM APPL. 79229/2025, CM APPL. 79230/2025, CM APPL. 79231/2025 NARENDER SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. versus RAJINDER KAUR & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Aditya Sharma and Mr. Vedic Thukral, Advs. for R- 3 with R-3 in-person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN Signature Not Verified SHANKAR Signed By:SAVITA PASRICHA RFA(OS) 20/2010 & connected matter Signing Date:23.12.2025 12:55:20 Page 1 of 17 JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, these two connected Regular First Appeals, assailing the correctness of an order passed on 11.09.2009 [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Order’] by the learned Single Judge in CS (OS) No. 690/2005, are taken up for final disposal by this common judgment. 2. Since both Appeals arise from the same suit, involve identical facts, and challenge the same Impugned Order, they are being disposed of together to avoid multiplicity of judgme