Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-12-04

GAUTAM ANAND & ANR. vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-1554/2025 2025:DHC:10887
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
GAUTAM ANAND & ANR.
Respondent
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 04.12.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 1554/2025 & CRL.M.A. 6961/2025 STAY, CRL.M.A. 6962/2025 EXEMPTION FROM FILING CERTIFIED COPIES ETC. GAUTAM ANAND & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Adv. (appearance not given) versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS. … Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP with SI Mukesh, PS Rajauri Garden. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 728/2018, dated 04.12.2018, registered at P.S Rajouri Garden, Delhi under Sections 323/354(A)/509/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. Amended Memo of parties filed which is taken on record. CRL.M.C. 1554/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:05.12.2025 11:36:16 3. As per averments made in the FIR, petitioners physically and verbally assaulted respondents including inappropriate touching and physical assault. Chargesheet has since been filed under sections 323/354/354(A)/509/34 IPC against the petitioners. 4. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and terms of settlement were reduced in the form of Memorandum of Understanding dated 26.11.2024, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure A-4. It is submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioners that a cross FIR No. 727/2018 under sections 323/354/427/452/506/34 IPC between the same parties has since been quashed by the coordinate bench of this court in CRL.M.C. 1614/2025 vide order dated 30.04.2025 5. All parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respecti

GAUTAM ANAND & ANR. vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. · Niyam