Delhi High Court · 2025-12-18
DAKSHINII DELHI DHARMIK RAMLILA SAMITI (REGD.) vs SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (SAI) & ORS.
- Citation / case number
- LPA-683/2023 2025:DHC:11535-DB
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- DAKSHINII DELHI DHARMIK RAMLILA SAMITI (REGD.)
- Respondent
- SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (SAI) & ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 11.12.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 18.12.2025 Judgment uploaded on: 18.12.2025 + LPA 683/2023, CM APPL. 51793/2023, CM APPL. 64181/2023 DAKSHINII DELHI DHARMIK RAMLILA SAMITI (REGD.) .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kunal Mittal, Mr. Rakshit Gupta, Advs. versus SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (SAI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh and Ms. Priya Khurana, Advs. for R-1 to 3. Dr. Monika Arora, Mr. Subhrdeep Saha, Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Ms. Anamika Thakur and Mr. Abhinav Verma, Advs. for R-4. + LPA 790/2023 SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS .....Appellants Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh and Ms. Priya Khurana, Advs. versus SHREE RAM DHARMIK RAMLILA SAMITI REGTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Dr. Monika Arora, Mr. Subhrdeep Saha, Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Ms. Anamika Thakur and Mr. Abhinav Verma, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Kunal Mittal and Mr. Rakshit Gupta, Advs. for R-2. + LPA 206/2024, CM APPL. 14699/2024, CM APPL. 14700/2024, CM APPL. 14702/2024 SHREE RAM DHARMIK RAMLILA SAMITI (REGD) .....Appellant Through: Dr. Monika Arora, Mr. Subhrdeep Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI NARAYAN LPA 683/2023 and connected matters Signing Date:18.12.2025 Page 1 of 8 13:21:59 Saha, Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Ms. Anamika Thakur and Mr. Abhinav Verma, Advs. versus SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshi Singh and Ms. Priya Khurana, Advs. for R-1 to 3. Mr. Kunal Mittal and Mr. Rakshit Gupta, Advs. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. The present batch of Letters Patent Appeals assail the correctness of the Judgment dated 04.