Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-12

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 44033 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 44033 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 44033 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44033 of 2025 Om Prakash .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepak Singh Yadav, Pratik Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Deepak Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 112 of 2025, under Sections 61(2) & 103 of BNS, Police Station - Muhammadabad Gohana, District - Mau, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence as alleged in the FIR. The FIR is delayed by about nine days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. The applicant is not named in the delayed FIR. His name has come up in the statement of informant recorded four days after the institution of FIR, as such, it is a clear cut case of false implication and as an afterthought. 5. Learned couns

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 44033 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam