CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35400 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35400 of 2025 Vikas Kumar .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Shukla, Rajesh Kumar Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Office vide its report dated 03.12.2025 has reported that notice issued to first informant of the case has been served personally. Despite service of notice, none appears for the informant, even in the revised reading of the list. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that according to the F.I.R., allegation, the applicant has enticed away the sister of the informant, whose date of is 10.07.2008. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the incident is alleged to have taken place on 05.06.2025, whereas the F.I.R., has been lodged on 07.06.2025 without there being any plausible explanation of such delay. Learned counsel further argued that according to the F.I.R., version, the age of the victim has been recorded as 10.07.2008, thus the