Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-01

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35108 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35108 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35108 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35108 of 2025 Antu .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Babu Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Despite service of notice none has appeared on behalf of informant even in the revised call. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is named in the F.I.R. along with two other accused. The F.I.R. alleges allegation against the applicant that had enticed away the minor daughter of the informant who was studied in Class-X and at the time leaving her house she also took twenty five thousand rupees and gold ornaments. When the victim was recovered her statement under Sections 180 B.N.S.S. was recorded wherein she has not made any allegation against the applicant, whereas, in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS she has developed her case by stating that applicant had committed wrong with her, however, in both the statements she admits th

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 35108 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam