Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-03

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19401 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19401 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19401 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19401 of 2025 Sameer .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harish Chandra, Jai Singh, Kiran Rani, Laloo Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rakesh Chandra Tiwari Court No. - 65 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. List revised. None appears on behalf of informant despite name of Shri Rakesh Chandra Tiwari, as the counsel for the informant is printed in the cause list. 3. Heard Shri Laloo Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that though the victim in her statements has made specific allegation against the applicant for committing her rape, but at the trial the victim (P.W.2) in her statement has not made any allegation of rape against the applicant and she has not supported the prosecution case, which statement has been filed as Annexure No. S.A.1 to the supplementary affidavit filed today. Thus, it is argued that there is bleak chance that prosecution may prove its case beyond r

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19401 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam