COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION vs YOGESH POONIA

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 22nd December,2025 + CONT.CAS.(CRL) 20/2025 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION .....Petitioner Through: None versus YOGESH POONIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Archit Upadhayay with Mr.Piyush Gautam, Ms. Lakshita Yadav and Ms. Muskan Aggarwal, Advocates with contemnor in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN JUDGMENT 1. The present petition seeks initiation of ‘criminal contempt’ against the respondent/contemnor for wilfully disobeying the mandatory directions passed by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr: (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar: (2014) 8 SCC 273, and not adhering to the directives contained in the Standing Order No. 109/2020. 2. Notice was issued to the contemnor, a Sub-Inspector at PS Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, and pursuant to the above, learned counsel for contemnor is present, with the contemnor. 3. The facts in brief are that on 08.06.2024, on the complaint of one Md. Asalam, FIR was registered under Sections 323/295A/452/427/506/34 IPC and the investigation was assigned to contemnor. It is alleged that during the course of investigation, the contemnor chose to arrest petitioner Nos.l & 2 on Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS.(CRL) 20/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:23.12.2025 15:48:10 the ground that they did not have any permanent address in Delhi. They were brought at police station and instead of serving them with any notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C., the contemnor chose to arrest them. 4. Learned counsel for contemnor, at the very outset, submits that contemnor is present and tenders unconditional apology. 5. The reply affidavit of contemnor is already on record in which