COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR vs VIDUR

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 11.11.2025 Pronounced on: 12.12.2025 + W.P.(C) 16651/2025 & CM APPL. No.68332/2025 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR ….Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashish K. Dixit, CGSC with Mr. Umar Hashmi, Mr.Harshit Chitransh and Ms.Iqra Sheikh, Advs. versus VIDUR .…Respondent Through: Mr. Samarth Luthra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN JUDGMENT MADHU JAIN, J. 1. This petition has been filed, challenging the Order dated 08.07.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 426/2019, titled Vidur v. Commissioner of Police and Anr., whereby the learned Tribunal allowed the said O.A. filed by the respondent herein with the following directions: “29. Respondents were required to consider all relevant facts. We find they have failed to do so. Hence in view of the above discussion and in the light of the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, the impugned orders are quashed and set aside. Respondents are directed to grant appointment to the applicant as Constable (Exe.) w.e.f. the date when others Signature Not Verified Signed By:RENUKA W.P.(C) 16651/2025 Page 1 of 14 NEGI Signing Date:15.12.2025 10:15:14 who had participated in the examination and succeeded were granted appointment. The applicant shall not be entitled to back wages but shall be entitled to all other benefits, including notional fixation of pay from the date when others, who had participated with the applicant and had been appointed as Constable (Exe.), joined the service. The aforesaid action be completed within three months of the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.” BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE: 2. In a nutshell, the