Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-12-16

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 100 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 100 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 100 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 100 of 2025 State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin.Secy. Deptt Of State Tax Lko. .....Applicant(s) Versus Himandri Trade Mart Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Its Representative Mr. Ashish Kumar Agarwal .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : C.S.C. Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. (I.A. No. 1 of 2025- Delay Condonation Application) 1. Heard. 2. Service is sufficient upon the respondent-petitioner, but none has put in appearance. 3. We, accordingly, proceed to consider and decide the application for condonation of delay in filing the review application as also the review application. 4. Although no limitation is prescribed for filing a review application seeking review of a judgement passed in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in view of the judgement of this Court in Review Petition No. 329 of 2010 (Smt. Mohd. Jahan Begum and another vs. Board of Revenue, U.P. Allahabad & others) vide order dated 23.09.2016, nevertheless the delay and laches have to be seen. We have gone through the affidavit explaining the delay in

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 100 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam