CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER vs SH ALI ROSHAN & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 15.12.2025 + W.P.(C) 18968/2025 CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank Manish, Ms. Nidhi Sahay, Mr. Shubham Ranjan, Mr. Ritansh Kr. Nand, Ms. Pragati, Singh, Advs. versus SH ALI ROSHAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rathi with Mr. Rahul Verma, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Piyush Beriwal and Mr. Krishna Kumar Shukla, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 78975/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed to subject, in all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 18968/2025 & CM APPL. 78974/2025 2. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 21.05.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’), in O.A. No. 1423/2021 titled Sh. Ali Roshan v. Union of India & Anr., allowing the O.A. filed by the respondent herein, with the following directions: Signature Not Verified Signed By:RENUKA W.P.(C) 18968/2025 Page 1 of 5 NEGI Signing Date:18.12.2025 16:20:03 “10. In the result, the present OAs are allowed in the following terms:(i) The impugned orders in all these OAs are quashed and set aside; (ii) The respondents are directed to grant the benefit of the order of this Tribunal in the case of RajKumar (supra) to the applicants in these OAs and accordingly, revise their pension; (iii) However, we make it clear that arrears of pay on revision of their pay may be restricted only for a period of three years prior to the date of filing of the present OAs; and (iv) The aforesaid exercise shall be complied with by the respondents within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order.” 3. The brief facts whi