BHUPENDRA KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 11th December, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 8860/2025 & CRL.M.A. 36968/2025 BHUPENDRA KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Komal Jain, Advocate (through VC). versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for the State with Mr. Lalit Luthra, Advocate. With SI Sachin, PS R.K. Puram. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition is filed against the order dated 25.10.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi whereby Respondent No. 2 was admitted on bail in FIR No. 47/2021 dated 11.02.2021, registered at Police Station R. K. Puram for offences under Sections 420/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’). 2. The petitioner also challenges the order dated 08.08.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi whereby the application preferred by the petitioner seeking cancellation of bail granted to Respondent No. 2 vide order dated 25.10.2024 was dismissed. Signature Not VerifiedCRL.M.C. 8860/2025 Page 1 of 9 Signed By:HARMINDER KAUR Signing Date:15.12.2025 18:02:21 3. Briefly stated, the FIR was registered on a complaint given by the petitioner/complainant who is stated to be the Managing Director M/s Matsya Fincap Pvt Ltd (‘complainant company’). It is stated that the complainant company is engaged in the business of providing loan facilities to prospective clients and is operating since the year 2018. It is alleged that in the month of November, 2018, Respondent No. 2 approached the complainant company and assured to provide numerous prospective clients to the complainant company. It is alleged that based on said representations, the complainant company allowed Responden