AYAZ AHMAD @ JAVED vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 1, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4140/2025 & CRL.M.A. 32209/2025 AYAZ AHMAD @ JAVED .....Applicant Through: Mr. M. Sufian Siddiqui, Mr. Rakesh Bhugra & Ms. Alya Veronica, Advs. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State. SI Pankaj Kasana, PS Anand Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present bail application is filed by the applicant seeking regular bail in FIR No. 383/2023 dated 13.09.2023, registered at Police Station Anand Vihar, for offences under Sections 420/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’). 2. The present FIR was registered pursuant to a complaint filed by the complainant, wherein, he alleged that on 25.11.2022, he visited the clinic of the applicant as he was suffering from chest pains for the past two weeks. 3. It is alleged that the applicant advised the complainant to take some test for his lipid profile. It is alleged that on instructions of the applicant accused Subham who claimed to be Signature Not Verified Signed By:KAMALDEEPBAIL APPLN. 4140/2025 Page 1 of 6 KAUR Signing Date:01.12.2025 20:25:51 an employee of S.D. Diagnostics took the blood sample of the complainant, whereafter, the complainant paid accused Subham a sum of ₹500/-. 4. It is alleged that in the evening of 25.11.2022, the complainant visited the clinic of the applicant, whereafter, the applicant informed the complainant that his lipid profile is normal. 5. It is alleged that, however, the complainant was not feeling well after taking medicines prescribed by the applicant and the complainant approached another doctor who advised the complainant to again take a test for his lipid profile. 6. It is alleged that after obtai