ARYA ORPHANAGE THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SH SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA vs MUKTI DUTTA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 12.12.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 18.12.2025 Judgment uploaded on: 18.12.2025 + FAO(OS) 101/2024 ARYA ORPHANAGE THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SH SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. A. S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Archit Mishra, Mr. Digvijay Rai, Kunal Kalra & Mr. Rahul Mourya, Advs. with Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhry (AR) versus MUKTI DUTTA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Ms. Poonam Shukla, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J REVIEW PET. 626/2025[Seeking review of the Judgment dated 29.08.2025] 1. By way of the present review application, the Review Applicant/Appellant in FAO (OS) 101/2024 seeks review of the judgment dated 29.08.2025 passed by this Court. Vide the said judgment, this Court dismissed FAO (OS) 59/2018, filed by the Appellant, challenging the dismissal of its application under Order VII Signature Not Verified Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Date:18.12.2025FAO(OS) 101/2024 Page 1 of 5 13:17:52 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’]. Additionally, the said judgment also disposed of FAO (OS) 101/2024, which was filed assailing the order passed on an application under Order XII Rule 1A of the CPC, whereby the LSJ permitted the transposition of Mr. Amit Bhushan, Defendant No. 2(iii) (Respondent No.2(iii) before this Court), as a Plaintiff in the civil suit. 2. Heard learned senior counsel for the Review Applicant [hereinafter referred to as ‘RA’] at length. 3. Learned senior counsel for the RA has made the following submissions: 3.1 It is argued that Late Mr. Lala Narain Dass, also known as Narain Dutt