Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-12-17

ARMY NO. GH-409 RAVI TOMAR,RETD vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-8962/2024 2025:DHC:11572-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ARMY NO. GH-409 RAVI TOMAR,RETD
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8962/2024 & CM APPL. 36623/2024-Dir. ARMY NO. GH-409 RAVI TOMAR, RETD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. Ayushi Srivastava, GP, Mr. Ayush Tanwar, Mr. Arpan Narwal and Mr. Kushagra Malik, Advs. with Major Anish Muralidhar. Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, CGSC with Ms. Usha Jamnal, ⁠Ms. Prajna Pandita and Ms. Nyasa Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT(ORAL) % 17.12.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. Though several issues have been raised in this writ petition, at the end of the day, the dispute has narrowed down to the issue of whether the petitioner, who seeks enrolment in the Indian Army, can be permitted to be so enrolled given his medical condition. 2. In view thereof, we do not deem it necessary to burden this order with a recital of any other facts. 3. The petitioner, who was part of the Army Boys Sports 4. He was denied recruitment on two grounds. One was that the petitioner had himself, in writing, declined to join the Army. The second was that he was medically disqu