ARCH EN DESIGN vs M/S MUKESH AND ASSOCIATES & ANR.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 27.11.2025 Judgment delivered on: 05.12.2025 W.P.(C) 8044/2023, CM APPL. 30979/2023& CM APPL. 54402/2023 ARCH EN DESIGN .....Petitioner versus M/S MUKESH AND ASSOCIATES & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Ms. Madhavi Diwan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Satvik Misra, Ms. Devashree, Ms. Aandrita Deb and Ms. Gunjan Dogra, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Santanam Swaminadhan, Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Mr. Karthik, Ms. Vaisnavi Jay, Advocates for R-1. Dr. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Subrodeep Saha, Ms. Anamika Thakur, Mr. Prabhat Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Verma, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA JUDGMENT TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. 1. Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 seeking quashing of the appointment letter of the respondent no.1/M/s Mukesh & Associates bearing no.Z-28016/72/2016-PMSYY-III dated 26.04.2023 (hereinafter referred to as “impugned letter”) in respect of the 2. Facts in brief are as under:- a) It is stated that UoI had floated an Expression of Interest vide reference No. ID