AMRITA NARANG vs HARPAL SINGH & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 2nd December 2025 + CS(OS) 93/2023 with I.A. 2556/2023, I.A. 8465/2023 and I.A. 1913/2024 AMRITA NARANG .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Shailen Bhatia, Ms. Ekta Nayar Saini, Ms. Deeksha Gulati, Mr. Aparna Sharma, Mr. Bhaven and Mr. Abhishek, Advocates. versus HARPAL SINGH & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Mohan, Advocate for D-1. Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Mr. Sudhir Tewari, Ms. Mehul Gulati, Mr. Naman Chowdhary, Mr. Rachit, Mr. Tarun Maan, Ms. Sonali Singh and Ms. Kavya, Advocates for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral) I.A. 8465/2023 (u/O VII Rule 11 of CPC) in CS(OS) 93/2023 1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff inter alia seeking a decree of declaration and permanent injunction. 2. This application has been filed under Order VII Rule11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter ‘CPC’) seeking rejection of the plaint on Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AARZOO CS(OS) 93/2023 Page 1 of 9 Signing Date:05.12.2025 18:50:23 the ground that the plaintiff has no right or interest in the properties that are subject to the said suit in light of Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as the subject properties belong to the grandfather of the plaintiff. 3. In this regard, reference may be made to the averments made in the plaint.:- 3.1. The plaintiff is the daughter of Sh. Harpal Singh, originally impleaded as the defendant no.1 in the suit. The plaintiff was born out of the wedlock of the defendant no.1 and Ms. Maya Devi. 3.2. The family pedigree chart as given in paragraph 7 of the plaint is set out below:- 3.3. The plaintiff contends that she is entitled to a declaration that the properties belonging to the Late Sh. Toka Ram, great-grandfather