ADITY SHIVCHARAN RATHOD vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:11th December, 2025 + W.P.(C) 6974/2025 & CM APPL. 31502/2025, CM APPL. 55086/2025, CM APPL. 59748/2025 ADITY SHIVCHARAN RATHOD .....Petitioner Through: None. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Mr. Yash Narain and Ms. Pragya Yadav, Advocates for R-2/SHO Email: [email protected] Mob: 8802991089 Insp. Ram Yadav, PS Jamia Nagar Mob: 8076444401 Mr. Prabhsahay Kaur, SC for DDA with Mr. Bir Inder Singh and Mr. A. Mishra, Advocates Mob: 7317391437 Email: [email protected] Mr. M. Hasibuddin, and Ms. Gracey Sachdeva, Advocates for R-4 Mob: 8800516037 Email: [email protected] Mr. Tarunvir Singh Khehar, Advocate for MCD (through VC) Email - [email protected] Mobile – 9910122225 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL): 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent no. 1-Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), to take steps against the ongoing illegal and unauthorized construction being carried out by respondent no. 4 in the plot measuring 200 sq. yds., out of the property Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Page 1 of 12 By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:13.12.2025 18:50:40 bearing No. 394-395 (adjoining Mumtaz Apartment 375-376), Gali No. 17, Main Road, Zakir Nagar, Jamia Nagar, Khasra No. 134/1, 167 and 169, Delhi-110025. 2. During the course of hearing, it has come to the fore that the present writ petition has been filed by using the name of the petitioner, i.e., Aditi Shivcharan Rathod, without her authorization. 3. It has been brought forth before this Court that various petitions have been filed by different names, through the same counsel and using the same set of documents, by ra