Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-13

WRIT - C No. 27326 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 27326 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 27326 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

A.F.R. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27326 of 2025 Hemant Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commision .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aishwarya Pratap Shahi, Nipun Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 33 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Justice Cardozo of course said: [ The Nature of the Judicial Process, Benjamin N. Cardozo pp. 168-69] The great tides and currents which engulf the rest of men, do not turn aside in their course, and pass judges by. We like to figure to ourselves the processes of justice as coldly objective and impersonal. The law, conceived of as a real existence, dwelling apart and alone, speaks, through the voices of priests and ministers, the words which they have no choice except to utter. That is an ideal of objective truth toward which every system of jurisprudence tends.... It has a lofty sound; it is well and finely said; but it can never be more than partly true. 2. It is true that the judges are flesh and blood mortals with individual personalities and with normal human traits. Still what remains essential in judging, Justice Felix Frankfurter said: [ The Judiciary and Consti

WRIT - C No. 27326 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam