Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-28

WRIT - A No. 9638 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 9638 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 9638 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9638 of 2025 Dina Nath Yadav And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India, Thru. The Secy. Ministry Of Railways Govt. New Delhi And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioners have sought following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the provisions stating restoration period as 15 years in Rule 11 A of the Railway Services (Commutation of Pension) Amendment Rules, 2015 as arbitrary and unconstitutional, with a further direction to the Govt. to restore full pension as soon the commuted value is recovered from the petitioner/ pensioner, instead of prolonging recovery up to 15 years. (ii) Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus for restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in the G.O. dated 02.09.2008. (iii) Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Opp. Pa

WRIT - A No. 9638 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam