Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-26

WRIT - A No. 12451 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 12451 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 12451 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 12451 of 2025 Bhajan Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harshdeep Kushwaha, Utkarsh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner who is a third party wants a direction to the respondent concerned to decide his representation. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that petitioner being busy buddy and complainant does not have any locus to maintain a petition. 4. Upon a pointed query being made as to what stake of petitioner is involved not being an employee of the respondent establishment, counsel for petitioner could not demonstrate from the pleadings that petitioner has any stake as employee of the establishment. 5. In the considered view of the Court, no third party petition at the instance of the complainant can be entertained, inasmuch as no public interest litigation is entertainable in service matters. 6. In view of the above, I decline to grant indulgence in the matt

WRIT - A No. 12451 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam