Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-25

WRIT - A No. 12286 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 12286 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 12286 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 12286 of 2025 S.I. Deena Nath Dubey And 36 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. 2. Petitioner, who is though currently working as Sub Inspector, claims benefit of one additional increment on completion of 19 years of service taking into account his initial training period. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the judgment of Ghanshyam Tiwari & Ors v. State of U.P. & Ors, Writ - A No. 44330 of 2012 and in the case of Dinesh Kumar Shukla & 14 Ors v. State of U.P. & 6 Ors, Writ - A No. 6429 of 2018 his claim is liable to be considered. He submits that intra court appeal has already been dismissed and law is now settled. 4. Learned Standing Counsel does not dispute the above legal position, in the event petitioner is demanding additional increment on the completion of 19 years of service as a Constable. 5. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a dire

WRIT - A No. 12286 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam