Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-19

WRIT - A No. 11837 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 11837 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 11837 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:141674 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11837 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Rai, Sub Inspector Respondent :- Union of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandrachud Pandey,Rajeev Giri,Toshiva Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard Sri Rajeev Giri, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has assailed the order dated 13th July, 2025, whereby he has been imposed with the punishment order denying him the claim of salary for the period running from 21st July, 2020 till 24th November, 2020 counting to 125 days. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has raised two fold arguments: (a) Firstly, there is no such punishment prescribed either under the head of minor penalty or under the head of major penalty as prescribed under the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991; and (b) Secondly, punishment in the nature of withholding salary of the petitioner for the period of 125 days is a result of alleged charge of absence from duty

WRIT - A No. 11837 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam