Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-12

WRIT - A No. 11575 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 11575 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 11575 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:136853 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11575 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Kumar Srivastav,Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Siddharth Singhal Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Siddharth Singhal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Commission and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus to command the respondent-Commission to consider the petitioner's candidature for appointment on the post of Lekhpal vide advertisement no.01-Examination/2022. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner scored 77.50 marks more than the last cut off marks of 70.75 marks in respect of the candidates who were called for document verification and yet the petitioner's candidature has not been considered. It is further argued that as on 27.06.2023, petitioner's candidature was shown as under process and yet he was not intimated about

WRIT - A No. 11575 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam