Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-07

WRIT - A No. 11295 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 11295 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 11295 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133578 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11295 of 2025 Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner who is working as Computer Operator with the forest department has come up with a claim for payment of Rs.18000/- as is being paid to the daily wagers employee of the Forest Department in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of State of U.P. and others v. Putti Lal:(2006) 9 SCC 337. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the petitioner is not working at Group D post as daily wager and has been engaged through outsourcing agency. 4. Be that as it may, since the petitioner wants enhancement of contract, he should approach the respondent no.2 through outsourcing agency and in the event he approaches through outsourcing agency raising grievance for enhancement of the contract that may be considered and disposed of by the competent authority within a maximum period of two months of production of certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observatio

WRIT - A No. 11295 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam