Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-06

WRIT - A No. 11247 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 11247 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 11247 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:132546 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11247 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mukesh Chaudhary Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailja Kant Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the disciplinary authority as well as the appellate authority. 3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel regarding maintainability of the petition in view of the alternate efficacious remedy available to the petitioner under U.P. Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991. 4. At this stage learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the statutory period prescribed for revision has already expired. 5. In the given facts and circumstances, I hereby provide that in the event petitioner prefers a revision-petition before the competent authority under relevant Punishment and Appeal Rules within four weeks from today within four weeks from today, the same shall be disposed of on merits wit

WRIT - A No. 11247 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam