VIVEK GARG, ADVOCATE vs STATE AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 28th May, 2025 Pronounced on: 11th August, 2025 + CRL.A. 815/2025 VIVEK GARG, ADVOCATE 9/7, Shakti Nagar, Patodia Palace, Delhi-110007 .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person (through VC) versus 1. STATE 2. AKHILESH PATI TRIPATHI MLA, Aam Aadmi Party, N-25/A-277, T-Huts, Lal Bagh, Near Azadpur, Delhi-110033. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia and Ms. Kanika Vohra, Advocates with SI Mithilesh Kumar, PS Civil Lines CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. Criminal Appeal under Section 378 (4) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”), has been filed on behalf of the Appellant/Complainant, Sh. Vivek Garg, Advocate, against the Judgment dated 21.03.2022 of the Ld. ACMM, New Delhi, whereby Respondent No.2, Akhilesh Pati Tripathi, MLA has been acquitted in the Complaint Case No.4/2019 under Section 420/468/409 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”). Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ANIL Page 1 of 19 KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:12.08.2025 17:14:23 2. The Appellant, Sh. Vivek Garg stated that he is an Advocate and RTI Activist who is fighting against corruption at all levels due to corrupt nexus of fulcrum of evils who are looting the country worst than the British. He had filed one such Complaint Section 200 Cr.P.C. against the Respondent No.2, Akhilesh Pati Tripathi, MLA from Model Town Constituency since 08.12.2013. 3. The allegations are that being an MLA and a public servant, he was entitled for reimbursement of medical expenses from Government of NCT of Delhi in regard to the treatment obtained by him, his spouse and dependent family members. The member of the fami