UNION OF INDIA AND ORS vs HFO SATYVIR SINGH (RETD)

Judgment text excerpt

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3257/2025 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, CGSC with Ms. Smritika Kesri, Adv. with Sgt Manish Kumar Singh and Sgt Mritunjay, Air Force (Legal Cell) versus HFO SATYVIR SINGH (RETD) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 07.08.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This petition assails order dated 24 May 2023 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal1 in OA 190/2022 whereby the respondent’s application for grant of disability pension on the ground that he suffers from Primary Hypertension with 30% disability has been allowed by the AFT. 2. The issue is covered by a recent decision rendered by us in UOI v Ex Sub Gawas Anil Madso2. 3. Nonetheless, we have heard Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, 1 “the AFT”, hereinafter 2 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018 Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 3257/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 8 KUMAR Signing Date:08.08.2025 18:10:38 learned CGSC for the petitioners, and have perused the record. 4. The respondent was released in Low Medical Category on his being found to be suffering from Primary Hypertension. From the record, including the proceedings of the Release Medical Board3, the following facts emerged: (i) The respondent had served in the Indian Air Force for over 38 years 8 months before he was diagnosed as suffering from Primary Hypertension. (ii) The respondent, in his self-declaration, specifically declared that he had not been suffering from Primary Hypertension prior to joining the Indian Air Force. The declaration reads thus: 3. Did you suffer from any disability before joining the Armed Forces? If so give details and dates: NO The correctness of