Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-08-22

SUSHIL KUMAR T/A DA POLO & ANR. vs THE POLO/ LAUREN COMPANY L.P.

Citation / case number
CM(M)-IPD-31/2025 2025:DHC:7159
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SUSHIL KUMAR T/A DA POLO & ANR.
Respondent
THE POLO/ LAUREN COMPANY L.P.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 22.08.2025 CM(M)-IPD 31/2025 & CM 180/2025 SUSHIL KUMAR T/A DA POLO & ANR. ..... Petitioners Versus THE POLO/ LAUREN COMPANY L.P. .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioners : Mr. Davesh Vashishtha, Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee & Mr. Himanshu Khulbe, Advocates (Through V.C.). For the Respondent : Mr. Rishi Bansal, Mr. Arpit Singh & Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA JUDGMENT TEJAS KARIA, J 1. The Petitioners (Defendants in the Suit) have filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (“Constitution of India”) being aggrieved by the order dated 04.06.2025 (“Impugned Order”) in CS(COMM) 575/2024 filed by the Respondent (“Suit”) passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial-01), South District, Saket Court, New Delhi (“Commercial Court”) rejecting the Application filed by the 2. Vide the Application, the Petitioners sought dismissal of the Suit / rejection of Plaint on the ground that the Suit is under-valued and the learned Commercial Court lacked pecuniary jurisdiction to decide the Suit, the learned Commercial Court lacked terr