Delhi High Court · 2025-08-21
SURESH KUMAR vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- CRL.M.C.-4715/2025 2025:DHC:7248
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- SURESH KUMAR
- Respondent
- STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 21.08.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 4715/2025 SURESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Adv. Petitioner in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. … Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Vinod Kumar, PS Palam Village. R-2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 673/2024, dated 19.11.2024, registered at P.S Palam Village, Delhi under Section 309(6) BNS [394 IPC] and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. As per averments made in the FIR, on 18.11.2024 at around 3 PM, Umed Ali i.e. victim/father of respondent no. 2 was returning to his fruit cart from the washroom when the petitioner allegedly kicked him on his private part and robbed him by snatching Rs. 15,000- CRL.M.C. 4715/2025 Page 1 of 8 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:23.08.2025 18:40:51 20,000/-. The Respondent no.2 took his father/victim to Indira Gandhi Hospital, Dwarka- where the doctors referred him to Safdarjung Hospital. Consequently, FIR No. 673/2024 was lodged at instance of Respondent no. 2 against the petitioner. 3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes with the intervention of common friends and well wishers and the terms of the compromise were reduced into writing in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding dated 13.05.2025. It is submitted that parties are well acquainted to each other since past 20- 25 years and pursuant to the aforesaid settlement, parties have mutually agreed to end the dispute