SUDHIR KUMAR vs STATE OF DELHI AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18.08.2025 + CRL.M.C. 5643/2025 & CRL.M.A. 24177/2025 SUDHIR KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kedar Yadav, Mr. Rahul Yadav and Ms. Nisha Singh, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus STATE OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Deepak Kumar, PS Ranhola. Mr. Kapil Bhardwaj, Advocate for R- 2 to 4 with R-2 to 4 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 704/2024 of PS Ranhola for offence under Section 110/351(2) BNS on the ground that the complainant de facto and injured persons (respondents no.2-4) have compromised the disputes with the petitioner. 2. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that State has no serious objection because it was basically a matrimonial dispute, which has now been settled. CRL.M.C. 5643/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af396 2c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f 80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.08.18 17:24:02 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:18.08.2025 17:46:11 3. Respondents no.2-4 present in courtroom and identified by Investigating Officer/SI Deepak Kumar accept notice. Respondents no.2-4 are accompanied with their counsel. 4. I have spoken with the parties in Hindi. Respondents no.2-4 are parents-in-law and wife of petitioner. It is stated by them that now all matrimonial disputes between petitioner and respondent no.4 stand resolved and now they are living together