SUBHASH & ORS. vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14.08.2025 + CRL.M.C. 4370/2025 SUBHASH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Counsel for petitioners (appearance not given). versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with Inspector Yogendra Kumar and SI Brahm Prakash, PS Sultanpuri. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 295/2016 of PS Sultanpuri for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has settled the disputes with petitioners. 2. Detailed statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. Learned APP submits that State has no serious objection to this petition. CRL.M.C. 4370/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb Signature Not Verified 4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - KATHPALIA 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cb d2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.08.14 18:07:33 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:14.08.2025 18:15:41 3. I have spoken with respondent no.2 present in court, who is identified by IO/SI Brahm Prakash. It is stated by respondent no.2 that for past about more than two years, she is living with the petitioners happily as all their matrimonial disputes stand resolved. It is also submitted by respondent no.2 that they have two children aged eleven and two and a half years. Respondent no.2 submits that she does not wish to pursue prosecution of the pe