SMT SAVITA JAIN & ORS. vs THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~36 & 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29.08.2025 + W.P.(C) 6606/2025 & CM APPL. 34621/2025, CM APPL. 38643/2025 SMT SAVITA JAIN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Mr. Imran Khan, Ms. Jahanvi Garg, Advocates (M:9313413721) versus THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anshula L. Bakhru, Advocate for R-1/MCD Mr. Vinay Rathi, Advocate for R-2 to 4 (M:9958799915) + W.P.(C) 8458/2025 & CM APPL. 36786/2025, CM APPL. 36787/2025, CM APPL. 51305/2025 SH GAURAV JAIN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vinay, Advocate (M:9958799915) versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Harshpreet Singh Chadha, Mr. Hridyesh Khanna, Advocates for DDA (M:9582055425) Mr. Vikas Chopra,SC-MCD with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate (M:9212036118) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J: (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition, i.e., W.P.(C) 6606/2025, has been filed with a prayer for directions to demolish the illegal construction being raised in Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 6606/2025 & W.P.(C) 8458/2025 Page 1 of 5 By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:29.08.2025 20:22:12 the property bearing No. 85/6, B-2, East Moti Bagh, Sarai Rohilla, Delhi- 110007. 2. There is a further prayer to cancel the letters of sanction and to take appropriate action upon the Complaint of the petitioners dated 31st March, 2025. 3. It is the case of the petitioners in W.P.(C) 6606/2025 that they are owners of the property in question and respondent no. 2 was living there as a tenant. However, respondent no. 2 has unlawfully executed a gift deed in favor of his sons, i.e., respondent nos. 3 and 4. Thus, on the basis of such documents, a Building Plan has als