SAVITA vs IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE

Judgment text excerpt

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 12.08.2025 + CM(M) 415/2025 SAVITA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rijul Taneja, Ms. Henna Narula and Mr. Nimrit Bhalla, Advs. versus IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM Appl. 12542/2025[Exemption from filing Trial Court record] 1. The Registry is directed to place on record the digital copy of the Trial Court Record duly paginated and book-marked in accordance with the rules of the High Court. 2. The Application stands disposed of. CM Appl. 21514/2025[Seeking early hearing] 3. The present Application has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. CM(M) 415/2025 4. The present Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 impugning the order dated 15.01.2025 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, MACT, District North, Rohini Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Application filed by the Petitioner for release of the remaining award Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:13.08.2025 CM(M) 415/2025 Page 1 of 3 10:07:15 amount was dismissed. 5. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the request of the Petitioner to release a sum of Rs. 17,13,220/- in pursuance of an agreement to sell dated 23.12.2024 executed by the Petitioner has not been released. 5.1 Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the learned Tribunal had passed an award dated 03.05.2023 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Award”] in favour of the Petitioner by which an amount in the sum of Rs. 20.69 lakhs was awarded to the Petitioner No.1. By the Impugned Award, various amounts were awarded to the Claimants therein.