Delhi High Court · 2025-08-20
SATISH JEARTH AND ANR vs ASHOK KUMAR JERATH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS
- Citation / case number
- CM(M)-3950/2024 2025:DHC:7147
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- SATISH JEARTH AND ANR
- Respondent
- ASHOK KUMAR JERATH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS
Judgment text excerpt
$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 20th August, 2025 + CM(M) 3950/2024 & CM APPL. 70087/2024 SATISH JEARTH AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: None. versus ASHOK KUMAR JERATH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kawaljit Kochar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Utkarsh Vats, Mr. Deepanshu, Mr. Drohn Garg, Advs. + CM(M) 348/2025& CM APPL. 10207/2025 & CM APPL. 18282/2025 SATISH JEARTH AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: None. versus ASHOK KUMAR JERATH (DECEASED) THR LRS AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kawaljit Kochar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Utkarsh Vats, Mr. Deepanshu, Mr. Drohn Garg, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. A suit was filed by Sh. Ashok Kumar Jerath (since deceased)/respondent herein, whereby he was seeking declaration and Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 3950/2024 & CM(M) 348/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:21.08.2025 16:24:53 permanent injunction. 2. During pendency of the abovesaid suit, two different applications were filed by defendants No.2 & 3. 3. By virtue of one such application, they wanted to place on record certain additional documents and the learned Trial Court vide order dated 04.11.2024 has dismissed such application. Such order is subject matter of CM(M) 3950/2024. 4. Defendants No.2 & 3 also moved an application under Section 151 CPC thereby seeking re-examination of defendant No.2 and such application has been dismissed by learned Trial Court on 08.01.2025. It also needs to be highlighted that one more application had been filed by defendant No.3 whereby he was seeking permission to place on record additional affidavit in her examination-in-chief and even such request was not acceded to by learned Trial Court. Such orders have been challenged by filing CM(M) 3