SANJEEV VIJ vs VEENA VIJ

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 89/2025 and I.A.3901/2025 Date of Decision: 06.08.2025 IN THE MATTER OF: SANJEEV VIJ S/O LATE SH. VISHWANATH VIJ R/O C-547, 2ND FLOOR DEFENCE COLONY, NEW DELHI – 24 .....PLAINTIFF (Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr Akshat Aggarwal, Advocate.) Versus VEENA VIJ W/O LATE SH. VISHWANATH VIJ R/O C-547, 2ND FLOOR DEFENCE COLONY, NEW DELHI – 24 .....DEFENDANT (Through: Mr. Dipesh Sharma, Advocate.) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) I.A.5678/2025 (u/O VII R 11 CPC) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the instant application preferred under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 2. Mr. Dipesh Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, contends that the plaintiff has himself admitted in his reply to the application that the property in question was inherited by the defendant from her mother. It is thus his case that the property belonged to the maternal grandmother of the plaintiff, over which the plaintiff possesses no enforceable right. 3. He submits that the claim advanced in the suit is predicated upon an alleged Will dated 18.11.