Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-08-26

SANJEEV KUMAR vs AAKASH JAIN

Citation / case number
CM(M)-885/2023 2025:DHC:7415
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SANJEEV KUMAR
Respondent
AAKASH JAIN
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 26th, August, 2025 CM(M) 885/2023 & CM APPL. 27945/2023 SANJEEV KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Yadav, Proxy Counsel. versus AAKASH JAIN .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The arguing counsel is, reportedly, indisposed but, at the same time, the proxy counsel appears and submits that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing with the present petition. 2. The status of the suit in question was checked on the website of Delhi District Courts and it is found that the suit in question i.e. CS (COMM) 323/2022 has already been decreed by the learned Trial Court way back on 15.04.2024. 3. The grievance in the present petition is with respect to order dated 19.01.2023 whereby the written statement of the defendant was refused to be taken on record observing that it was beyond the permissible outer limit of 120 days. 4. Fact remains that, since the suit in question has already been decreed by the learned Trial Court on 15.04.2024, nothing further survives in the present petition. 5. Needless to say, in case, the defendant challenges the abovesaid de