RAVINDER KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 26.08.2025 + W.P.(C) 12944/2025 & CM APPL. 52894/2025 RAVINDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Mr.Anshuman Mehrotra, Mr.Nikunjj Arora, Mr.Arjun Panwar, Mr.Amrit Kaul, Mr.Prahid Sharma, Ms.Muskaan Dutta, Ms.Anushka Verma, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Balendu Shekhar, CGSC, Mr. Vivek Nagar, GP along with Mr.Rajkumar Maurya, Mr.Krishna Chaitanya, Mr.Divyansh Singh Dev, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed, challenging the Order dated 12.08.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in R.A. No.107/2024 in O.A. No.214/2020, titled Union of India & Ors. v. Ravinder Kumar & Ors., allowing the review petition filed by the respondents herein and recalling its earlier Order dated 08.04.2024 passed in the above O.A., and directing that the O.A. be heard afresh finally on 25.08.2025 at 2:30 P.M.. We are informed that OA could Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed WP(C) 12944/2025 Page 1 of 3 By:REYMON VASHIST Signing Date:29.08.2025 19:25:51 not be taken up for hearing and has been adjourned. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no ground for review has been made out by the respondent nos.1 and 2 and, therefore, the Impugned Order is contrary to law. He submits that all the contentions of the respondents had been duly considered by the learned Tribunal while passing the Order dated 08.04.2024. The said order was challenged by the respondents before this Court by way of a Writ Petition, being W.P.(C) 13101/2024, which, after some arguments, was withdrawn with libert