RAJINDER KUMAR JAIN vs THE STATE

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 17th July 2025 Pronounced on: 29th August 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2034/2025 & CRL.M.A. 16560/2025 EXEMPTION, CRL.M.A. 16561/2025 RAJINDER KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Priyankar and Ms. Ishika Jain, Advocates. versus THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State. Mr. Sarwar Raza, Mr. Muhammad Zaid, Mr. Mohd. Waseem, Mr. Nabil Raza, Mr. Arnab. C, Mr. S. Ahmed and Ms. Shreya Kumar, Advocates for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is an application under Section 482 BNSS filed on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 523/2024 under Section 420 IPC, registered at PS Shakarpur. 2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that allegations against the petitioner are false, frivolous and motivated and have been made BAIL APPLN. 2034/2025 Page 1 of 6 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:30.08.2025 10:32:39 with intent to harass and humiliate him. It is submitted that dispute is clearly civil in nature which has been given a criminal colour. 3. It is submitted that complainant and another person helped the petitioner and gave him financial aid and got signed various documents and petitioner was also kidnapped. All the payments have been returned by the petitioner but the original receipt is with the complainant and petitioner retains only a photocopy with him. 4. It is submitted that petitioner was well aware of the property to be under encumbrances and still went ahead with the sale of the property. Petitioner also provided his mobile phone containing the video clip in which he and the complainant are seen talking with each other in a bank and in such