Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-08-25

RAJ KUMAR vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-757/2025 2025:DHC:7320
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 25th August, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 757/2025 RAJ KUMAR S/o Nand Lal R/o Jhuggi No.A-192, Village Bhadola, New Delhi. .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for Petitioner (appearance not given). versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through its SHO P.S. Mahendra Park. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with Insp. Harkesh Meena CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. An Application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed on behalf of the Applicant Raj Kumar for grant of Regular Bail in case FIR No.1006/2023 under Section 302/34 IPC registered at Police Station Mahendra Park. 2. It is submitted that the Applicant is in Judicial Custody since 26.10.2023 and the case is pending before the learned Sessions Judge for recording of Prosecution Evidence. 3. It is the submitted that the investigation qua the Applicant is Signature Not Verified Signed By:RITA BAIL APPLN. 757/2025 Page 1 of 4 SHARMA Signing Date:26.08.2025 18:44:46 complete; Chargesshet has already been filed and there is no possibility of tampering with evidence by the Applicant and that no purpose would be served by keeping him in Judicial Custody. He had filed an Application for Bail, which was been dismissed by learned ASJ, Delhi vide Order dated 21.12.2024 stating that FSL Report of CCTV footage of the incident has not been received till date. 4. The brief facts of the case are that on 26.10.2023, an information received vide DD No.14A, P.S Mahendra Park, regarding injured Rajesh being admitted in BJRM Hospital by his friend Varun Yadav. He died during his treatment and his MLC was collected. ASI Ijaj Ali tried to trace the eye witnesses, but none could be found on the spot. The FIR, therefore, registered on

RAJ KUMAR vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) · Niyam