RAHUL KUMAR PAL AND ORS vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 25.08.2025 + CRL.M.C. 5845/2025 & CRL.M.A. 25006/2025 RAHUL KUMAR PAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Datt, Advocate with petitioners in person versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with IO/ASI Rajesh Malik Mr. Abhinav Chauhan, Advocate with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 25007/2025 (delay of 70 days in re-filing the petition) 1. For the reasons mentioned therein, the delay of 70 days in re-filing is condoned. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5845/2025 2. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 03/2024 of PS CAW Cell, Nanak Pura for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that CRL.M.C. 5845/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc Signature Not Verified a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - KATHPALIA 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965f f801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed Date: 2025.08.25 17:39:34 -07'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:25.08.2025 18:00:47 the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 3. Respondent no. 2 present in Court and identified by IO/ASI Rajesh Malik accepts notice. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that State has no serious objection to this petition. 4. I have spoken with the parties in Hindi. It is stated by respondent no. 2 and petitioner no. 1 that they have now resolved all matrimonial disputes between them. It is also submitted by them that now they are livin