RACHNA vs STATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 28th August, 2025 CRL.M.C. 94/2021 & CRL.M.A. 427/2021 RACHNA W/o Pawan R/o A-13, New Govindpura, Near Ram Mandir, Krishna Nagar, Delhi-51. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avinash Lakhanpal, Advocate (through VC) versus 1. STATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) 2. RAJ KUMAR S/o Late Shri Ganga Ram R/o 13/74, Geeta Colony, Delhi-31. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State Mr. Vikas Padora, Mr. Dipanshu Chugh and Mr. Aakash Kumar, Advocates for R-2 . CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C”) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Smt. Rachna 2. The brief facts of the case are that on 28.09.2012 Smt. Rachna, the Petitioner along with Smt. Kanchan Kakkar, purchased the property measuring about 200 sq. yds. with construction rights from Raj Kumar, Respondent No.2 and his brother Bhushan Kumar, on payment of valuable consideration, after which they both became the joint owners. The Sale Deed was registered on 28.09.2012. 3. The Compl