Delhi High Court · 2025-08-07
PURAN KUMAR CHUG AND ANR vs RAGHBIR SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ORS
- Citation / case number
- C.R.P.-381/2024 2025:DHC:6712
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- PURAN KUMAR CHUG AND ANR
- Respondent
- RAGHBIR SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ORS
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 07.08.2025 C.R.P. 381/2024 PURAN KUMAR CHUG AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: None. versus RAGHBIR SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ORS .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] against the order dated 11.11.2024 passed by learned District Judge, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Application filed under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC has been allowed. 2. Concededly, the Application that has been allowed for impleading a party to the suit is not amenable to revisionary jurisdiction under Section 115 of the CPC. 3. The maintainability of this Petition is a subject matter of challenge. It is no longer res integra that the provisions of Section 115 of the CPC cannot be invoked except where an order, if made in favour of the revisionist, would have finally disposed of the suit or proceedings. This is set out in the proviso to Section 115 of th