Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-27

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 882 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 882 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 882 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 882 of 2025 Raju .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Mishra, Aditya Kumar, Rakshak Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner-complainant had filed a complaint on which the District Magistrate ordered an enquiry which has already been conducted, and as per the petitioner, nothing has been found to be amiss. He disputes the enquiry report and challenges it before this Court. 3. The petitioner can approach the District Magistrate concerned and point out the deficiencies in the enquiry or otherwise, unless there is any legal impediment, which can be looked into by the District Magistrate. 4. However, he shall also see as to whether the complaint is actuated by any malafide, as it is informed by Shri Pratyush Chaubey, learned Standing Counsel that the Gram Pradhan has filed an F.I.R. against the petitioner. This aspect can also be seen. 5. The writ petition is accordingly dispos

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 882 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam