Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-08-27

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 866 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 866 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 866 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 866 of 2025 Jay Karan Singh And 46 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farooqahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., O.P. Tiwari Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1.Vakalatnama filed by Shri O.P. Tiwari, learned Counsel for the opposite party no. 5 is taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. The grievance of the petitioners is that the land in question was being used as a 'rasta' but the opposite party no. 6, which is a private society, has made constructions thereon. 4. Shri S.K. Singh, learned C.S.C. refutes the contention of the petitioners on the basis of written instructions to the effect that the land is not recorded as 'public road' or 'rasta', but is recorded as 'bhumidhari' land in the name of opposite party no. 6. 5. Considering the nature of the dispute which has arisen, we are of the opinion that this is not a case for consideration as a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as primarily, it appears to be a private dispute. Th

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 866 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam