PARDEEP KUMAR vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 21st August, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 5772/2025, CRL.M.A. 24716/2025 & CRL.M.A. 24717/2025 PARDEEP KUMAR S/O JAI PRAKASH R/O H. NO. 63, VILLAGE MUKHMELPUR DELHI-110036 .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, Advocate versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO PSALIPUR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Sandeep, P.S. Alipur CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner/Accused, Pardeep Kumar to challenge the Order dated 04.08.2025 of Ld. ASJ vide which the Application under 319 Cr.P.C. filed by the Applicant/Petitioner for summoning of suspects Ranbir Khatri, Suman, Sahab Singh, and Balwan Singh, has been dismissed. Signature Not Verified Signed By:RITA CRL.M.C. 5772/2025 Page 1 of 8 SHARMA Signing Date:23.08.2025 18:37:17 2. Briefly stated, the case of the Prosecution is that on 14.06.2014, the Complainant Ravinder/Amardeep had made a complaint that his Naani Indravati, aged 75 years and his Mausi Geeta, aged 40 years had left their home on 13.06.2016 without any information and have not come back since then. 3. On investigation, through call CDRs, the witness Aryan, son of Geeta, was traced who stated that on 13.06.2016 while he was present at his house, his mother Geeta had told him that that Pardeep had called his mother i.e. Indravati to BDO Block, Alipur and that they went there. Pardeep had asked Indravati to pay sum of Rs.20,000/- for growing the agricultural yield on their land and that when she refused, some argument took place between them. 4. Further investigations done thro